Candidate Comparison
Saturday, July 10th, 2010Candidate Comparison
Dear Friends,
We all have choices when considering the future of our state. If you like the way things in
our state government and Republican Party have gone, then either of my competitors will be a fine choice. However, if you want to see more freedom from government and a more conservative direction, please consider supporting me. Our future is bright if we will return to our Founding Fathers’ understanding of government and the Constitution.
The Republican Party has clearly drifted from conservatism. Republican lawmakers and candidates have bowed to public sector unions to get elected and to maintain their positions at the expense of the people of Michigan. Unknown to most in our state, the public sector unions and the MEA (Michigan Education Association) control much of the primary process for both the Republican and Democrat Parties and this has led to having “one political monster with two heads.” We have seen taxes and regulations increase with repeated help from both Republicans and Democrats. We should all be asking, “Why has any party supported efforts that have destroyed our state’s economy?” It’s quite simple: they did it to get re-elected.
The public sector unions and the MEA maintain control by “helping” Republicans and Democrats who in turn maintain the status quo in education and our state’s budget. On 3 occasions I have been offered “help” from groups that generally work to elect Democrats. The only thing required was that I not advocate for “Freedom in Education.” I have refused this “help” instead of selling out to those who have no intention of allowing our state to recover. Every candidate who claims to be conservative should be asked, “What is your position on education?”
The MEA/Democrat groups have been active at recommending and working to elect “rhino republicans” who will stay clear of real education reform and real cost cutting. The MEA also has supported Planned Parenthood which is bent on making abortion more available to our children without parental consent. How can a leader be considered to be 100% pro-life with such a conflict? How can they be conservative while accepting help from such a group? One Republican candidate in this race has a MEA representative running his campaign.
I believe that we need to reform education to give our kids the best education options for
their futures and we need to place parents in charge of their children’s education, not the
government or the teachers union(MEA). We have one of the most costly education systems
and we are not getting our money’s worth. Our children deserve better.
We will not be able to cut the taxes in this state until we have a true discussion about cutting back the scope of government and our bloated public sector. Our businesses are being crushed by the weight of taxes for benefits to government employees. That makes our state among the worst in the nation to own a business because of this mounting debt/tax burden – we need to change this now!
Both of my competitors have long political careers. They have mastered the art of “leaving the back door open.” There are some stark contrasts with what my competitors have been willing to state publicly. I believe if a man seeks to be elected to office and will not state his views on government clearly, then it should beg the question – what are they committed to if they will not state it?
I have explained much of my political philosophy in this chart. I leave it to you to decide if I am worthy of holding a position of leadership. I believe we can no longer afford to have people in office who will not clearly say what type of future they are fighting to create – is it a future of more government or more liberty and freedom? We can’t have both. We need a new direction for our people and our state while improving our options for education and easing the tax burden
on our businesses. Please pray for our state, that those who are elected will seek God’s direction and move to restore individual liberty and freedom!
May the Lord bless you and your family and may He restore our great state!
Todd A. Courser
Candidate for State Senate
Hager |
Courser |
Pavlov |
|
| MBT Elimination | PNS | Committed | PNS |
| Right to Work State | PNS | Committed | PNS |
| Part-time Legislature | PNS | Committed | PNS |
| Freedom in Education | PNS | Committed | PNS |
| MEA Recommendation | PNS | Refused | PNS |
| 2nd Amendment | PNS | CPL Holder | CPL Holder |
| Pro-life Commitment | Committed | Committed | Committed |
| PAC Funding | Prior PAC Funding | None | Large PAC Funding |
| Checkout the websites | www.LaurenHager.com | www.VoteToddNow.com | www.PhilPavlov.com |
I have created this chart highlighting the issues I feel are essential to restoring prosperity. The information was gathered from candidate websites. If they have a stated position, I have listed it and if not, then I have recorded it as “Position Not Stated or PNS.” All notations precede 6-15-10.

